Dickinson is a school for the super privileged this includes morbidly obese and retarded jew mulattos who only get in thru tribal affiliation. Her career plan is getting fucked by a different guy every night while receiving money from the government. Used to date a girl who graduated from Dickinson in Worst thing that ever happened to me. I thought I knew what a gas lighting sociopath was… Boy was I wrong. Is this implying that white men can learn from niggers and women? Just as heat always moves from warm to cold, knowledge always moves from white men to subhumans.
Either one of the great satires recently written , or a deeply pathological exegesis of a broken culture. I am disgusted that my Dickinson, a place of higher learning and free ideas with merrit, would print this trash. I am a white boy and was raised to be respectful of all races, however in the face of all the Black rage at white people i have become a bit more opinionated. Most of the people who are commenting obviously havent read the article and have just gotten upset about the headline. It sucks because they seem to need this article most of all.
Get PDF Equity Release ~ or ~ the Tragedie of Sir Douglas Dee
The article is not inflammatory in any way. The Dickinsonian has published mostly far-right oriented op-eds in the past few months, and it goes to show how reactionary our society is that one of the few further left articles instantly goes viral. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, the premier academic free speech advocate awarded their anti-free Speech Code of the Month award to Dickinson which can be seen here.
Add this to the report by DickinsonDad above and I am reminded of Mr. To paraphrase, in Dickinson all have free speech, but some have more free speech than others. President Ensign informs us that Ms. Fisher is likely an accurate example of what a Dickinson liberal arts education is producing in the current era. Social media and the internet, like it or not, will be our ledger.
That said I am so thankful for your honest and open opinion piece Leda, as I am confident, that in the ever-evolving future your personal opportunity to serve in a potential leadership role in our society will be nixed. Some years from now, this opinion piece will resurface, our ever expanding societal expectations will hold you accountable for your past racists, sexist and hate filled words and ideas. How could someone with your hateful ideology represent an inclusive country, state or county, let alone a school board or aspire to principle of an elementary school?
I am confident in the evolution that disallows selective racism, sexism, and other hateful ideologies you so angrily adhere to and I ensure you Leda, your type will be cast out of leadership roles in a kinder, more inclusive society. What I will offer you is something more valuable, a way out. This may be, as a young person, a good time to seriously reflect on how you ended up down this road… as a racist bigot, a person of hate.
I know there is some love in your heart, compassion as well. Serious and honest self examination may lead to some healing for you and perhaps this is a learning moment that can change and alter the thinking and feelings you are dealing with. Hate begets hate. Others are externalizing your struggle to their political and ideological advantage -a technique used no different by other racist and hate-filled entities on the opposite spectrum. Jung will be of help to you. Please search. Even the most hateful of racists can change Leda, my suggestion is in your self exploration spend some time listening to Daryl Davis.
Please consider meeting him if you can. People like Daryl are changing people like you, one person at a time. Maybe you will someday hand over to him your Dickinson cap and gown. I sincerely wish you luck Leda in changing your heart and mind, and if there be none, I very much look forward to your influential demise. Here I thought that Dickinson College was an elite instution with high admission standards. Sad that Dickinson wasted so many resources on Ms.
The thing that is really scary is that people like Ocasio Cortez and Kamala Harris are ideologically very similar to Fisher and Harris stands a good chance to become the next president of the United States. As a Jewish White Boy who proudly served 17 years in the US Army, and intensely hates anyone telling me to shut the hell up, I read your rant with interest and I think I have the following solution for you should you decide to accept it. This would solve your problem of having to listen to us talk, and it would also solve the problem of us having to listen, or in this case read, about you bellyaching about it.
Rarely has such a priceless opportunity been so flippantly squandered. The hope of all the white people who genuinely rejoiced that a Black Man had been elected to the highest possible office, the hope that finally we might be on the last lap of the endless marathon, thrown right into our faces and our faith greeted with rage and contempt. Our good faith efforts spat upon. Our attitude now when informed that Blacks suffer from injustice?
Leda, you young people need to think about the consequences of your college actions. Just look at what is transpiring with the governor of VA. Evidence of his racism followed him into adulthood. You have memorialized your racism and sexism in the school paper. If I saw this kind of racism expressed in your online activity, I certainly would not be calling you for an interview. She was no doubt better educated her first day of class than she will be at graduation.
This fanciful ideology, born in a twirling merry-go-round of envy in the recesses of the Neighborhood of Make-Believe, divides the world along every imaginable category, declaring some oppressors and others oppressed. Can you claim victimization? Poor unenlightened MLK, whose dream was I speak as a cultural Marxist, not a sane human being for people to be judged on the content of their character, not the color of their skin!
He should have dreamed all along that his children would judge others on their skin color all day long, character be damned. Listen: If you believe that it is impossible for a member of a minority race to be racist, than a 3 year-old is literally smarter than you. But no, Mr. Obama squandered what was likely the most golden opportunity given to a person of color ever. Instead of actually diminishing racialism and the validity of the concept of race, he buttressed it and did seemingly everything in his power to re-establish racial divides and racial hostility and to portray the state of diversity and equality of opportunity in America as being about 30 or 40 years behind where it actually is.
Whether sincere or just trolling for a reaction, congrats on shooting yourself in the foot. You can only fuel division with such an attitude! So much identity invested in skin…. I only ask that you do the same for me. As a man of color i stand with this posting. White males are now a minority in many universities across this stolen land. As ppl of color are rising and awakening, we no longer want or need to hear youre voices. Unless you listen first and stand with the rise of ppl of color, i dnt want youre white male opinions.
This land we live on was stolen by white males who we all know murdered and raped and destroyed native ppls and renamed this land and made roads and bldngs with names honoring white male thieves and murderers. Then brought slave labor from Africa to build even more. Dont even tell me you had nothing to do with this, white male!
You are going to college and creating careers making tins of mny on land youre forefathers stole. And dnt tell me youre forefathers had no part in slavery or murdering natives, or that your forefathers came after slavery, because they still built theyre wealth on land stolen from natives and built by slave labor.
And you and every white male today who is making any kind of mny and weakth is making that mny on stolen land with opportunities given you by white males before you who stole the land and murdered and enslaved ppl of color. So with us rising in wealth, and going to college in record numbers and we now dominate music and popular culture and dominate sports, and just voted into offices in record numbers, and even movies are starting to demand us ppl of color, we are the new majority soon, and no, youre voices will not matter to me and most ppl of color.
It is our time now, and if you dnt agree with me, again, youre voice means nothing to me. Id love to see the day when you are ran out of this land back to europe. Embarrassing article from an overrated college. Even the faculty knows it sucks. Come and stop me from talking………………………. DickinsonDad, you are right on target!
This is not an argument about the content of the article by Leda, but by the fact that conservatives on campus are routinely condemned and discriminated against by students, professors and administration. There is only free speech on campus if the administration agrees with your views! Otherwise, you are shut down.
Truly disappointing! No wonder the college continues to drop in its rankings. Booker T. Washington said it best, way back in His statement is still just as valid today, if not more so. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.
What are you going to do about it? What I can offer to you is some advice and it can simply stated. There is no healing without an effort on your part to intelligently and respectfully engage iin conversation and debate. There is no hope for understanding and empathy when people are shamed or intimidated into silence.
Hate always begets hate. I hope this was disclosed to the Federal Election Commission — it is impossible to see how drivel this inflammatory, unreflective, and cartoonish in lack of academic merit does not count as an in-kind donation to the Trump campaign. Someday Leda Fisher will look for a job and this dreck will keep her from getting it. To the other white men criticizing this piece, I would encourage you to take a breath and ten minutes, and think about why you are reacting the way you are. Some of my relatives from older generations were killed in wars and turmoils of not-so-distant past, just for their ethnicity and love of freedom and independence.
How did we let miss Leda walk down this path of hate and insecurity? If white men speaking made you feel so insecure why did you choose a school in the heart of mennonite country?? The issues you have with people which are different than you are personal, and will hold you back in life. Show kindness, strength, and let this undue hate go.
Go to church honey. Imma pray for you to get beyond this troubling time. God dont like ugly. I applaud you for this piece. Continue to voice your opinion! Great read. Thank you! I will be donating to Dickinson thanks to this piece!! A force to be reckoned with, I would definitely hire you!! Please do not listen to the voices trying to silence you. Clearly, they have never walked a mile in your shoes.
Hopefully those people making negative comments never have to ask you for a job…. White males are indeed smarter and more dedicated to learning and thinking. It was wrong to allow woman to be there — and people of other races. Now we have hatred on whites, females without children and whites marginalzed by all others hatred.
As a college student, though not at Dickinson, this article is full of truth, and I commend the author for writing it. But considering how offended all these people in the comment section are, maybe it hit just a little too close to home. Yet the only time fellow white people feel angry enough to comment is when someone points out the poor behavior of their friends or children. Hi Leda: You succeeded in raising awareness of the problem: that white boys believe they are entitled to talk over others as if they know better.
Or am I giving you too much credit? To think my great great Uncles and Grand father fought and died on the Union side for you to express such hate. All while pretending their own bitter, horrible prejudice is pristine, and above reproach. Perhaps your daughter can get a job with Al, or Jesse, or any of the others making a living from promoting this kind of race-based resentment and anger. If we want racism to not exist in society and as you said, it does! Race is a social construct created by insecure white men to oppress others. You, Leda Fisher, are the very reason for division in this country.
You, Leda Fisher, only promote more racism. Your daughter chose the latter when she posted her racist hate-filled opinion piece in the Dickinsonian. You comment about the physical location of Dickinson. Yet you knew the location of the College when your daughter had her first visiting day. She applied, accepted admission, and enrolled anyway. I bet a good portion of that money came from white boy families.
Talk about biting the hand that feeds you! Every student was fine walking around campus until your daughter spewed her hatred. Your daughter, singlehandedly, has made it unpleasant for herself, my son, and many other students on campus. But she created this shitstorm for lack of a better word , and now we all have to deal with it. My guess is because it is impossible to do so without taking a hard look inside and accepting responsibility.
What Leda is trying to say is that it is irresponsible and ignorant to use your position of privilege to speak about the Black experience in America and to continue doing so only highlights how dense and self serving your are. Listen and quit whining. Go Leda! Let the institution feel the effects of a reduction in their funding. Why do I say that? My God, for a school that places an emphasis on language instruction, the extent to which these comments butcher Latin grammar is mind boggling. If you are a male, you are an alumnus. You are an alumna. And unless perhaps you are group texting, you are most definitely not an alumni.
Congratulations on an outstanding, well written piece! It seems to have the alt right racists of America riled up! Everyone is entitled to their opinion. It is how we express it that we are judged on. This article sheds a bad light on Dickinson and what is perceived as this was all I received from 4 years of education under their tutelage. I have a student enrolled there and this saddens me that my hard earned dollars are contributing. If I as a white boy wrote an article to his degree I most certainly would be facing hate mail and or someone seeking some sort of retribution.
Dickinson administration needs to be seen and heard from. Rather than arguing about the intent of the author, why not simply move on to the numbers. How does this underrepresented population somehow monopolize all the discussion among their majority peers? So making nasty and judgmental attacks against a race and gender is not racist? You really think that the only form of racism manifests itself in institutional racism? That is only one form as there are many. This woman is angry; ignorant and yes, racist. Call it what it is and stop enabling crappy behavior. The real problem?
So, so glad this piece has been published.
abiwyzyhasym.cf: Philadelphia local news, sports, jobs, cars, homes
It is extremely important that the full warped and twisted vitriol of people like Leda and her mother is laid bare. This piece proves beyond all doubt that reverse racism and sexism towards white males exists, is growing in boldness and bitterness. It is obscene to defend this article. Beyond belief. But no, it should not be removed. No, the author should not be expelled or subjected to any form of University discipline. The student body itself must be given free rein to tell Leda why she is wrong, what standards are expected and that while she has the priviledged of free speech, others have the equal right of free criticism.
If she lasts more than a few days on campus, then Dickinson is lost. Who says this? The media? Pop culture? Sports teams? Music execs? Silicon Valley? The fact is, the only people that tell white boys their voice was important was their parents. And any parents can do that. Who knew Pennsylvania was such a racist hellhole. So if it comes down to it, yes I prefer white privilege to black privilege, and patriarchy to rule by the likes of Leda Fisher.
There is no compromise. You do not sound ready for that, which does not speak well for either you or your Dickinson education. It is a guaranteed ticket to anger and unhappiness. This woman is full of hate and resentment, buoyed by 3rd wave feminism and intersectionality, Look beyond the fashionable college critical theory programming. Look to the beauty of the true nature of man and woman.
That which makes us different binds us. Is this who the college want to represent them? Closed-minded racists like Leda and her mother spew hatred and create a greater divide between people. Their social media is all about activists and bias Leda suggests he classmates should not speak.
Saavedra, Angel de, duque de Rivas
She chooses to generalize about people based on gender and race. As a bi-racial female from NYC, accepted to a liberal arts college, perhaps she the one brining less to the table to contribute and should listen to some of her classmates who have gathered here from various states, countries, and have differing experiences to contribute to most conversations.
Perhaps if she were to open her mind and listen she might learns something. She does not reflect our values and expulsion should be considered. This is what progressive tribalism in education produces; young minds turned to mush. Asserts no white boy can possibly have a valid opinion regarding such uniquely black experiences as not having enough money, not getting a job you wanted because of unfairness or any other thing a black person experiences.
Gordon v. Pete's Auto Service of Denbigh, Inc. On February 14, , the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an opinion holding that the SCRA amendments providing an express private right of action for damages should apply to this case. On October 27, , the Division participated in oral argument as amicus in Gordon v.
The court ordered supplemental briefing on whether amendments made to the SCRA on October 13, , adding an explicit private right of action, are retroactive. On November 29, , the Division filed a supplemental amicus arguing that the amendment providing an express private right of action for damages should apply retroactively in this case.
Groome and United States v. Jefferson Parrish E. The Parish zoning ordinance required the group home provider to seek an accommodation to house five persons instead of the permitted four. The court held that the Parish broke the law when it failed to act on the request because of opposition from neighborhood residents and a member of the Parish Board.
The Parish appealed the decision to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, arguing that the Fair Housing Act protections for persons with disabilities are unconstitutional. The Civil Rights Division intervened and filed a brief arguing that Congress had power to pass the legislation under both the Commerce Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.
The United States also filed an amicus brief in the district court. On November 20, , a unanimous three-judge panel joined three other Courts of Appeal holding that the Commerce Clause authorizes Congress to regulate the housing market. Hamad v. Woodcrest Condominiums Association E. Town of Milbridge, Maine D. Town of Milbridge, Maine C. In this case, defendant Town of Milbridge adopted a moratorium that halted development of plaintiff's proposed housing project of farmworkers and their families. The plaintiff alleges that the moratorium was adopted because of resident opposition based on the national origin and familial status of the prospective residents.
Our amicus brief was submitted in connection with plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction. We did not take a position on the merits, but set out our view as to the applicable legal principles. Hargraves v. Capitol City Mortgage Corp. In this lawsuit against Capital City Mortgage Corp. In their complaint, the plaintiffs claim that Capital City's lending practices violated several federal laws, including the Fair Housing and the Equal Credit Opportunity Acts by engaging in a pattern or practice of targeting African American communities, a practice known as "reverse redlining," for abusive or predatory lending practices.
The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that reverse redlining does not violate either law because they have provided credit to African Americans, and on the same terms that they would provide to whites. On March 23, , the United States filed an amicus brief , which supported the view that lending practices designed to induce minorities into loans destined to fail could violate the fair lending laws.
The fact that a lender does business only in minority neighborhoods does not shield its business from scrutiny under federal fair lending laws. In addition, racially targeted loans that are designed to fail make housing unavailable because of race since the borrowers are likely to lose their homes through foreclosure. The matter was settled and dismissed on March 27, The Federal Trade Commission has filed a separate action charging the same defendants with violating a number of federal consumer protection laws.
- Loyalist Literature: An Annotated Bibliographic Guide to the Writings on the Loyalists of the American Revolution (Dundurn Canadian historical document series).
- Rub It In (Mills & Boon Blaze) (Island Nights, Book 3).
- Dawn names index | Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies?
FTC v. Capital City Mortgage Corp. The matter was settled on March 14, When she sold her home to move closer to the new base, Homecomings denied MSgt Gomez's request to waive the prepayment penalty on her residential mortgage loan. Hope Lutheran Church v. City of St. Ignace W. Jagannath Organization for Global Awareness, Inc. Howard County, Maryland D. LeBlanc 5th Cir. In consolidated cases brought by the United States and Louisiana ACORN Fair Housing and Gene Lewis, plaintiffs alleged that the defendant, the owner and operator of an apartment complex in Lake Charles, Louisiana, intentionally discriminated on the basis of race against Gene Lewis when he refused to rent him a studio apartment.
LeBlanc appealed the judgment, arguing that Lewis' punitive damages award should be vacated because the jury awarded him neither compensatory nor nominal damage. On June 10, , the Division filed an amicus brief in the Fifth Circuit arguing that the Fair Housing Act permits an award of punitive damages in the absence of compensatory or nominal damages, and that the district court had properly entered judgment in accordance with the jury's verdict awarding punitive damages to Gene Lewis. On May 15, , the Fifth Circuit reversed and vacated the jury's punitive damages award to Gene Lewis, holding that a plaintiff suing under the Fair Housing Act may not receive punitive damages absent an award of compensatory or nominal damages.
The Supreme Court denied certiorari on March 5, Loveless v. Milton and Richard Grant Co. Metropolitan St. Louis Equal Housing Opportunity Council v. Gundacker Real Estate, Co. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc. Township of Mount Holly 3rd Cir. National Fair Housing Alliance v. Facebook, Inc. Facebook S. Facebook moved to dismiss, arguing, among other things, that the Communications Decency Act immunizes it from the FHA. National Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. Spanos N. Opulent Life Church v. City of Holly Springs 5th Circuit. Facebook N. In the case, the plaintiffs allege that Facebook uses its data collection and advertising tools to segregate users of the platform into different groups by race and national origin.
That, according to the lawsuit, allows property owners and developers to target and exclude certain users according to those characteristics from seeing housing-related advertisements, in violation of the Fair Housing Act. The statement of interest argues that the plaintiffs have alleged sufficient facts to support a claim of housing discrimination under the Fair Housing Act, and that Facebook does not have statutory immunity under the Communications Decency Act for the development of its data collection and advertising tools.
Property Casualty Insurers Association of America v. Donovan N. The United States signed a modification agreement with Pulte Home Corporation Pulte to supplement and amend a settlement agreement previously entered into with Pulte in July The settlement agreement resolved the United States' allegations that Pulte had failed to design and construct certain developments in Florida, Illinois, and Virginia to be accessible to persons with disabilities as required by the Fair Housing Act.
The modification agreement covers three additional properties in Las Vegas, Nevada, and includes provisions requiring Pulte to annually notify current owners, for a period of three years, of their option to have Pulte retrofit their units at no expense to them in order to bring them in compliance with the Act, as well as to report to the United States the names and addresses of those persons who elect to have their units retrofitted. Ramapough Mountain Indians, Inc. Township of Mahwah D. The tribe also alleges that the Township treated it differently from other similarly situated nonreligious groups.
Redeemer Fellowship of Edisto Island v. Town of Edisto Beach D. The case, Redeemer Fellowship of Edisto Island v. Town of Edisto Beach , involves a small Christian congregation that sought to rent space for Sunday worship in the Civic Center, which is available for rental by community groups to hold events and activities. The Town responded by enacting a policy barring worship services at the Civic Center, citing separation of church and state concerns.
The church filed a First Amendment suit and sought a preliminary injunction to allow it to rent the facility. On December 31, , the Town voluntarily rescinded its ban on religious worship services at its Civic Center. Reed, et al. Penasquitos Casablanca Owner's Association 9th Cir. A federal court jury in San Diego, California found that the defendants employee, a condominium security guard, had sexually harassed the plaintiff. However, the judge refused to let the claims of the plaintiff's two sons and grandson go to the jury. The judge also refused to let the jury consider whether to grant punitive damages.
The plaintiffs appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and the Civil Rights Division filed an amicus brief on November 7, , arguing that the claims of the children should have gone to the jury, and the judge should have allowed the jury to decide whether to award punitive damages. City of Middletown S. City of Mission Woods D. The Tenth Circuit has defined substantial burden under the statute as government actions that prevent participation in religious conduct motivated by a sincerely held belief. The United States argued that to decide whether government action prevents participation in religious conduct requires a holistic analysis that focuses on whether a religious institution has a reasonable expectation of approval, the existence of feasible alternatives for religious exercise and whether pursuing alternatives would cause the religious institution substantial delay, uncertainty, and expense.
The United States contended that other federal courts had considered these factors, and that the Archdiocese had presented sufficient evidence of each to avoid summary judgment on its substantial burden claim. Sherman Avenue Tenants' Association v. District of Columbia D. Southwest Key Programs, Inc. City of Escondido S. The United States had filed a statement of interest in this case on November 3, , to address the question whether the protections of the Fair Housing Act extend to group homes for unaccompanied children in the care and custody of the United States Department of Health and Human Services.
The plaintiff in the case sought to operate such a home in the City of Escondido and alleges that the city discriminated on the basis of race and national origin when it denied the request for a conditional use permit to operate the group home. The defendant moved for summary judgment, arguing, among other things, that the FHA does not apply. Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc. The Supreme Court's ruling was consistent with the position taken in an amicus brief filed by the United States on December 23, The United States argued that HUD, the agency charged with interpreting the Act, has authoritatively interpreted the FHA to provide for disparate impact claims by means entitled to deference under Chevron U.
NRDC, including in a formal regulation promulgated in and in formal adjudications. Finally, the United States argued that a state or local government does not violate the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause merely by considering whether a proposed action will have a disparate impact on the basis of race. Settlement Agreement U.
On April 1, , the United States entered into a settlement agreement with the developer, architect, site engineer, and homeowners association of Spanish Gardens Condominiums respondents in suburban Las Vegas, Nevada. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the respondents will within 60 days of the Agreement, submit a plan for completion of the remaining required retrofits to the common areas, for approval by the Division.
After an initial notice, owners shall receive additional notices of the opportunity to retrofit their units, at no cost to them, on an annual basis for three years. The respondents shall also report information regarding future design or construction of multi-family housing and certify to the Department that such design or construction fully complies with the Act. Thomas v.
Anchorage Equal Rights Commission 9th Cir. This case was referred to the Division by HUD as a pattern or practice case. Under the terms of the settlement, respondents Trop-Edmond, L. Respondent Danielian will conduct annual in-house training for a period of three years to its employees involved in the design of multi-family dwellings. Trujillo v. On September 8, , the court entered a consent order resolving Trujillo v. The United States' complaint , which was filed on May 13, , alleged the condominium association engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination on the basis of disability when they established a written policy prohibiting persons in wheelchairs from using the front door to the condominium building and when they applied that policy to a ten-year-old boy who uses a wheelchair who lives in the building.
The consent order also requires the president of the association's board of directors to resign, issue new by-laws, and require training of its members on the provisions of the Fair Housing Act. The complainants filed a lawsuit in this matter in March, DeStefano D. This is a Fair Housing Act disability discrimination case filed by the owners of two recovery houses for people with addictions, who allege that the city of New Haven failed to make a reasonable accommodation by allowing more than eight to ten persons to reside in the houses.
On February 22, , the United States filed a brief as amicus curiae to address legal issues raised by defendants, without taking a position on the merits of the summary judgment motion. United States v. The complaint alleges that the owner and property manager Matthew Adam Properties of a unit housing cooperative in New York, NY violated the Fair Housing Act by refusing to allow a tenant with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder to keep an emotional support beagle in his unit.
The case was referred to the Division after the Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD received a complaint, conducted an investigation and issued a charge of discrimination. The court entered the consent decree on March 28, On July 20, , the court entered a stipulation and order of settlement and dismissal in United States v. The parties executed a settlement agreement on June 29 to resolve this lawsuit , filed by the U. Among other relief, the defendants also will adopt reasonable accommodation policies and will provide annual training regarding the Fair Housing Act and reasonable accommodation policies to all current and future employees and agents.
Acme Investments, Inc. On October 1, , the court entered a consent order in United States v. Adams W. The consent order also calls for injunctive relief, including training, a nondiscrimination policy, record keeping and monitoring. The consent order will remain in effect for four years. On July 2, , the court entered the consent decree in United States v.
ADI Management, Inc. The United States Attorney's Office brought this action on behalf of the estate of the complainant, who lived at the subject property until she died from metastatic breast cancer at the age of The complaint , filed on June 5, , alleged that the defendants, the owner and property management company of an apartment complex in Jamaica Estates, Queens, violated the Fair Housing Act when they failed to make a reasonable accommodation to their no-pets rule to allow the complainant to keep an emotional support dog in her unit, and instead served her with eviction notices.
The Division alleged that she was suffering from anxiety and depression, caused by being mobility-impaired due to the cancer. The decree also enjoins the defendants from: violating the Fair Housing Act on the basis of disability in the future; requires them to adopt specific guidelines for assessing requests for reasonable accommodations; and requires the president of the property management company to attend a fair housing training program. The consent decree will remain in effect for three years.
Advocate Law Groups of Florida, P. Lindeman, Jr. Lindeman discriminated against Hispanic homeowners because of their national origin in violation of the Fair Housing Act. Specifically, from to , the defendants deliberately targeted complainants and other homeowners because of their Hispanic national origin for an unfair and predatory loan modification and a foreclosure rescue service scheme.
The defendants instructed complainants to cease contact with their lenders or servicers and to stop making mortgage payments. Albanese Organization, Inc. On May 24, , the court entered a final partial consent decree in United States v. The complaint , which was filed on January 18, , against the designers and developers of The Verdesian, an apartment building in New York City, alleged that the defendants violated the Fair Housing Act by failing to design and construct The Verdesian so as to be accessible to persons with disabilities. Alaska Housing Finance Corp.
Albank N. The bank could provide no reason for carving out areas with large concentrations of minority individuals from its lending areas. The case was referred to the Division by the Office of Thrift Supervision. The violations include steps into the individual units, an insufficient number of curb cuts, doors which are impassable by persons using wheelchairs, no reinforcements in the bathroom walls for the installation of grab bars, and an inaccessible rental office.
Altmayer N. The United States' complaint , filed on March 2, , alleged that Peter Altmayer intimidated and harassed his next door neighbors, and their two minor children, on the basis of their religion Jewish and national origins Israeli and Mexican. The consent decree will remain in effect for five years. This case was handled primarily by the U.
Attorney's Office. The case was referred to the Division after the Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD received a complaint, conducted an investigation, and issued a charge of discrimination. Altoona Housing Authority W. Ambroselli E. American Family Mutual Insurance E. This case was the Department's first challenge, under the Fair Housing Act, to racial discrimination in the provision of homeowner's insurance. Over nine million dollars was directed toward community-based relief, such as a home purchase and home improvement loan subsidy; financing cost assistance; home ownership counseling; and a emergency home repairs fund.
The agreement also provided that the company issue a non-discrimination statement, recruit qualified prospective customers from the state's insurance plan, conduct random testing, no longer exclude homes solely on the basis of the age or sales price of the home, and provide a new custom value policy so that quality insurance coverage will be more widely available. The decree also established a five million dollar fund to compensate individual victims; over 1, households in the community received damages. American Honda Finance Corporation C. Andover Forest Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. Andrian-Zeminides Architects, Ltd.
Apartment and Home Hunters, Inc. Appleby W. Applewood of Cross Plains W. Ashford County Housing Authority M. Associates National Bank D. As a consequence, some Spanish-language applicants were denied credit on a discriminatory basis. The United States also claimed that approved Spanish-language UNOCAL applicants were given lower credit line assignments than applicants processed through the English-language decision system. Finally, we contended that the bank offered different promotional credit services to those who applied through the Spanish-language system from those commonly offered to other customers.
The United States estimate that as a result of ANB's actions, approximately 1, Hispanic applicants and customers who utilized ANB's Spanish-language applications were adversely affected. Any funds remaining after all claims have been paid will be used for consumer education in Hispanic communities. This is the first fair lending case brought by the Department of Justice alleging discrimination in connection with credit cards. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency referred this matter to us. United States and State of North Carolina v. Auto Fare, Inc. Autumn Ridge Condominium Association, Inc.
On October 22, , the court entered a consent order in United States v. The complaint , filed on July 14, , alleged that the Condominium Association and the members of its Board of Directors in located in Munster, Indiana, maintained a written policy that prohibited families with minor children from living in the condominium complex The complaint further alleged that members of the Board made oral statements indicating a preference against families with children and that the policy was enforced in a discriminatory manner to exclude African-Americans from living in the condominium complex.
The consent order also provides for extensive injunctive relief, including fair housing training, reporting requirements, and the resignation of the president of the condominium board. Avatar Properties, Inc. Bank of America N. Bank of America Corp. Bernard L. On April 1, , the court entered a consent order resolving United States v. Bernard, L. The complaint , filed on April 15, , alleged a pattern or practice of race discrimination by the owners of apartments in Chalmette, Louisiana.
Specifically, the complaint alleged the owners and managers of the Foster Apartments, either turned away black testers or steered them to an apartment building in a black neighborhood while encouraging whites to rent their other properties. The four-year decree also provides for monitoring of the defendants' operation of their business, requires them to undergo training, and imposes restrictions on any subsequent buyer of the rental properties. Badeen D. The complaint alleged that the defendants, the owners and managers of Joe's nightclub, one of the largest night clubs in Wichita, Kansas which was formerly known as Acapulco Joe's, discriminated against Latino and African American patrons and potential patrons.
In the consent order, the defendants admit that African American and Latino individuals were wrongly excluded from the club. In addition to prohibiting future discrimination, the consent order requires the defendants to modify its admission and ID checking policies, train employees, advertise its new procedures and nondiscrimination policies in English and Spanish, and document its compliance efforts. BancorpSouth Bank N. The United States filed this case after a determination by the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] that reasonable cause existed to believe that Bank United discriminated against a loan applicant and her children on the basis of disability.
The complaint contended that the bank requested information from the applicant concerning the nature and severity of their disabilities when she sought a mortgage loan. On May 9, , the court entered a consent decree in United States v. Barnason S. The complaint , filed on on April 20, , alleged that the managers and owner of three residential apartment buildings in Manhattan engaged in a pattern or practice of sexual harassment of female tenants in violation of Fair Housing Act.
Defendant Barnason is a Level 3 sex offender who was hired after being released from prison for various sexual offenses. This is the largest award ever recovered in a sexual harassment suit brought by the United States under the Fair Housing Act. Also under the decree, the building manager who engaged in the most severe of the harassing conduct is permanently enjoined from having any involvement in the management or maintenance of occupied rental housing property.
The United States filed a fair housing election complaint alleging that the defendants discriminated against the complainant and her son on the basis of their familial status, by refusing to rent an apartment and falsely telling her that an apartment was not available. Defendants own a single-family home in Cheyenne, Wyoming, as well as a number of other small rental properties in that area. Additional relief includes: an injunction prohibiting discriminatory housing practices by the defendants in the future; mandatory fair housing training for Mr.
Barone and his employees; and an agreement that Ms. Barone will withdraw from the management of rental properties. On October 22, , the court Lawson, J. Barrett M. The Division's complaint , filed October 9, , alleged that John Barrett, an Athens, Georgia apartment-complex owner and developer, violated the Fair Housing Act by failing to construct accessible housing in seven apartment complexes which he owns and operates.
In addition to Mr. Barrett, the complaint named several companies with which he is associated as defendants in the lawsuit. Three of the apartment complexes are located in Athens, Georgia; two are located in Statesboro, Georgia; and one is located in Greenville, North Carolina. By signing the decree, the defendants admitted their failure to design and construct the subject properties in compliance with the requirements of the Fair Housing Act.
The consent decree requires Mr. Barrett and his companies over the next 15 months over the next 15 months to retrofit the public and common use areas of the seven complexes and of the individual apartments units to make them accessible to persons with disabilities. Among the features which will be retrofitted are bedroom and bathroom doors which are too narrow to accommodate persons who use wheelchairs; clear floor space in bathrooms that is inadequate for use by persons in wheelchairs; and excessive sloping of the pavement leading up to dwelling unit entrances as well as the thresholds to those entrances which makes it difficult for persons who use wheelchairs to enter units.
On August 23, , the court entered a consent order in United States v. Bathrick D. The United States' complaint , which was filed on December 19, , alleged that Ronald Bathrick engaged in discrimination on the basis of sex, including severe, pervasive, and unwelcome sexual harassment in rental units he owned and managed in Hastings and St. Paul, Minnesota. The complaint was originally brought to the Division's attention through a private local attorney. Enterprises, Inc. On May 2, , the court entered a consent order in United States v. The complaint, which was filed on December 10, , and amended on November 2, , alleged that a towing company in Norfolk, Virginia towed and sold a Navy Lieutenant's car without a court order, in violation of the SCRA.
The complaint also alleged that the defendants may have towed and sold at least twenty servicemembers' cars without court orders. On November 6, , the court issued an order on summary judgment resolving "a question of first impression" by adopting the United States' position that Section of the SCRA is a strict liability statute and finding that servicemembers need not notify towing companies of their active duty status in order to benefit from the SCRA's protections.
The court rejected defendants' arguments that it is impractical to verify a vehicle owner's military status and ruled that, "even if the defendants exercised the utmost care in investigating their victims' military status, they face liability for their actions. On December 2, , the court entered a consent decree resolving United States v.
Beaudet D. The Defendant, David R.
Beaudet, has owned and managed numerous single-family rental homes throughout St. Paul since The complaint , filed February 19, , alleged that Beaudet subjected female tenants to severe, pervasive, and unwelcome sexual harassment. Specifically, the complaint alleged that he subjected female tenants to unwanted sexual touching and advances, conditioned the terms of women's tenancy on the granting of sexual favors, and entered the apartments of female tenants without permission or notice.
He has also agreed to hire a management company to manage his rental properties. Bedford Development S. Belshaw C. The complaint , which was filed on April 10, , alleged that a California landlord violated the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act SCRA when he refused to return pet and key deposits to a United States Air Force Lieutenant after he lawfully terminated his lease prior to move-in upon receipt of military orders requiring him to relocate to Texas.
Bensalem Township E. On September 1, , the parties entered a settlement agreement in United States v. As part of the agreement, Bensalem Township, Pennsylvania will permit the Bensalem Masjid, a Muslim nonprofit religious organization, to use its property for the purpose of building a mosque.
The complaint , which was filed on July 21, , alleged that the Township violated the substantial burden, equal terms, nondiscrimination, and unreasonable limitations provisions of RLUIPA by denying the Bensalem Masjid a use variance to build a mosque on its property. The complaint also alleged that the Township only permitted places of worship on properties zoned as part of the Institutional District, and no properties with that zoning designation were available in that district when the Bensalem Masjid acquired the property.
Bernards Township D. Biafora's Inc. Big D Enterprises, Inc. The United States had filed this case after a determination by the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] that reasonable cause existed to believe that the defendants refused to rent to an African American household. Our complaint , filed on March 13, , added a claim that this refusal to rent to black persons was part of a pattern or practice of racial discrimination in rentals. The defendants appealed the jury verdict and the district court's injunction prohibiting the defendants from engaging in future acts of discrimination.
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's judgment and its opinion is reported at F. The Bigelow Group, Inc. Blackpipe State Bank D. Black Wolf, Inc. The Mounty N. Blueberry Hill Associates W. Blue Meadows Apartments D. On February 22, , the United States filed a complaint and entered into a settlement agreement in United States v. Board of Commissioners of the County of Montezuma D. Boston Housing Authority D. Bouquet Builders, Inc. United States and Prach v.
Bowen Property Management E. Boyers' Personal Care Homes W. Breckenridge Plaza E. Brazoria Manor Apartments, Ltd. While living among the Ute, Meeker tried to extend his policy of religious and farming reforms, but they were used to a hunter-gatherer lifestyle with seasonal bison hunting, as opposed to one which would require them to settle on a particular piece of land. He angered the Utes by plowing a field they used to graze and race horses. They wanted to gain the rich land occupied by the Ute under the Treaty of Nathan Meeker had a tense conversation with an irate Ute chief after he began to force his lifestyle on the Utes.
Meeker wired for military assistance, claiming that he had been assaulted by an Indian, driven from his home, and severely injured. On September 29, , the Ute attacked the Indian agency, killing Meeker and his 10 male employees.
Thornburgh's soldiers near Milk Creek. Eskridge, Carl Goldstein, W. Chief Ouray of the Uncompahgre Ute , who had not been involved in the uprising, attempted to keep the peace after the massacre and attack on Army forces. He and his wife, Chipeta, helped negotiate the release of the women and children who had been taken hostage. Major Thomas T.
Thornburgh led a command of soldiers , and twenty-five militiamen , to the White River Agency  : —19 from Fort Steele on September 21, , in response to a request for assistance by the Nathan C. On September 29, , Ute warriors simultaneously ambushed Thornburgh's forces and, at the Indian agency, killed Meeker and Meeker's white employees. Within a few minutes, Major Thornburgh and 13 men were killed, including all his officers above the rank of captain. Another 28 men were wounded. Three-quarters of the horses and mules were killed at leisure by the surrounding Utes.
The US forces held out for several days. Chief Colorow joked with his band of warriors about the smell of dead animals the troops had to endure. Over the next three days, thirty-eight of the forty-two animals that Captain Dodge brought with him were killed, and the other four were wounded. Dodge focused on securing encampment and gathering drinking water. Henry Johnson, who was responsible for the guards in the outposts, made rounds of the outposts under heavy fire to check on his men.
In gathering water for the troops from the nearby creek, there were some accounts that the Utes would not shoot at black soldiers. Larger U. Army relief columns were sent from forts Steele and Fort D. Colonel Wesley Merritt commanded 5 troops from the 5th Cavalry Regiment, or about troops, who traveled by train and marched to reach the surviving forces on Milk Creek on October 5. Meeker and his ten associates were killed. Eleven soldiers were awarded the Medal of Honor and approximately thirty were decorated for heroic conduct in one of the most decorated battles of the Indian wars.
After the Milk Creek and White River incidents, there was intense hostility toward the Utes, both within Colorado and the American army, and mounting pressure to drive them entirely from the state, or to exterminate them altogether. Treaty negotiations were the result of the intercession of Secretary of the Interior Carl Schurz , who stopped any movement of forces against the Ute until such time as the hostages were safely released.
We liked Principal and are now the wasting away in Citimortgage hell. What a frustrating 6 months it has been. I have spent at least 30 hours on the phone getting things fixed. I once asked for a confirmation for a late fee removal and was given one. Maybe CitiWorld monitors blogs. Hope so. I am investigating the process for re-financing out of this rat maze. Our mortgage just got transferred to Citimortgage. This being our first house I am already paranoid and on-edge about doing everything just right. So I read this blog with a sick stomach as I realize the problems that await me.
I really want to throw-up. Is anything being done legally about this? I am glad at least that I know what to expect so I can save checks and such. Well hows this another Principal to CitiMortgage Horror story. At the time of the filing we did not include principal in the origional petition. We kept making the mortgage payments and were happy campers other than we had to pay attorney fees to a local counsel that principal hired in our city to represent their interests in the bankruptcy. Well in april of I lost my job so we were unable to make our chapter 13 payments and petitioned that the 13 be discharged and that the case be converted into a chapter 7.
Well it happened and all this time we were thinking that our saving grace once we emerged was that we would have the mortgage payments to help reestablish and salvage our credit. Well we started getting monthly statements from CitiMortgage and on the statement it said this is not an attempt to collect a debt and that this was included at one time in a bankruptcy.
Well I was told that the mortgage had been written off. Well I was informed that since there was no reaffirmation agreement at the time that the chapter 7 was discharged and by the way the second mortgage holder who is also as snakey as Citimortgage followed through with the bankruptcy courts and was able to get a reaffirmation agreement signed and filed. Well Citi said that since this was not done that the loan is not going to be reported and was never reported last year.